Companion restrictions in the emergency department during COVID-19: physician perceptions from the Western Cape, South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To determine emergency department (ED) physicians' perceptions regarding hospital companions being prohibited from accompanying the patient during COVID-19. DESIGN: Two qualitative datasets were combined. Data collected included voice recordings, narrative interviewing and semistructured interviews. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted and guided by the Normalisation Process Theory. SETTING: Six hospital EDs in the Western Cape, South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit a total of eight physicians working full time in the ED during COVID-19. RESULTS: The lack of physical companions provided an opportunity for physicians to assess and reflect on a companion's role in efficient patient care. Physicians perceived that the COVID-19 restrictions illuminated that patient companions engaged in the ED as providers contributing to patient care by providing collateral information and patient support, while simultaneously engaging as consumers detracting physicians from their priorities and patient care. These restrictions prompted the physicians to consider how they understand their patients largely through the companions. When companions became virtual, the physicians were forced to shift how they perceive their patient, which included increased empathy. CONCLUSION: The reflections of providers can feed into discussions about values within the healthcare system and can help explore the balance between medical and social safety, especially with companion restrictions still being practised in some hospitals. These perceptions illuminate various tradeoffs physicians had to consider throughout the pandemic and may be used to improve companion policies when planning for the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and future disease outbreaks.

The acceptability of delayed consent for prehospital emergency care research in the Western Cape province of South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is an essential prerequisite for enrolling patients into a study. Obtaining informed consent in an emergency is complex and often impossible. Delayed consent has been suggested for emergency care research. This study aims to determine the acceptability of prehospital emergency care research with delayed consent in the Western Cape community of South Africa. METHODS: This study was an online survey of a stratified, representative sample of community members in the Western Cape province of South Africa. We calculated a powered sample size to be 385, and a stratified sampling method was employed. The survey was based on similar studies and piloted. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 807 surveys were returned. Most respondents felt that enrolment into prehospital research would be acceptable if it offered direct benefit to them (n = 455; 68%) or if their condition was life-threatening and the research would identify improved treatment for future patients with a similar condition (n = 474; 70%). Similar results were appreciable when asked about the participation of their family member (n = 445; 66%) or their child (n = 422; 62%) regarding direct prospects of benefit. Overwhelmingly, respondents indicated that they would prefer to be informed of their own (n = 590; 85%), their family member's (n = 593; 84%) or their child's (n = 587; 86%) participation in a study immediately or as soon as possible. Only 35% (n = 283) agreed to retention data of deceased patients without the next of kin's consent. CONCLUSION: We report majority agreement of respondents for emergency care research with delayed consent if the interventions offered direct benefit to the research participant, if the participant's condition was life-threatening and the work held the prospect of benefit for future patients, and if the protocol for delayed consent was approved by a human research ethics committee. These results should be explored using qualitative methods.